Comparison between different types of compressor

Comparison between Reciprocating Air Compressor and Rotary Air Compressor:
Aspects
|
Rec. Air Compressor
|
Rot. Air Compressor
|
1.Suitablity
|
Suitable for low discharge of air at high Pressure.
|
Suitable for handling large volume of air at low pressure.
|
2.Operational Speed
|
Low
|
Usually High
|
3. Air Supply
|
Pulsating
|
Continuous
|
4. Balancing
|
Cyclic Vibration occur
|
Less Vibration
|
5. Lubricating System
|
Generally complicated
|
Generally Simple lubricating s/m.
|
6.Quality of air delivered
|
Generally contaminated with air
|
Air delivered is relatively more clean
|
7. Size
|
Large for the given discharge
|
Small for the same discharge
|
8. Free air handled
|
250-300 m3/min
|
2000-3000m3/min
|
9. Delivery pressure
|
High
|
Low
|
10. Usual standard of Compression
|
Isothermal compression
|
Isentropic Compression
|
Comparison of Centrifugal Compressor and Axial flow compressor:
Aspects
|
Centrifugal Compressor
|
Axial Flow Compressor
|
1.Type of flow
|
Axial (Parallel to the direction of axis of the machine)
|
Radial
|
2.Pressure ratio per stage
|
High (about 4.5:1)
|
Low (about 1.2:1)
|
3. Isothermal efficiency
|
About 80-82%
|
About 86-88%
|
4.Frontal area
|
Larger
|
Smaller
|
5.Flexibility of operation
|
More
|
Less
|
6. Part load performance
|
Better
|
Poor
|
7. Effect of deposit formation on the surface of impellor rotor
|
Performance not adversely affected
|
Performance adversely affected
|
8. Starting torque required
|
Low
|
High
|
9. Suitability for multistaging
|
Slightly difficult
|
More suitable for multistaging
|
10. Delivery pressure possible
|
Up to 400 bar
|
Up to 20 bar
|
11. Efficiency V/S speed curve
|
More flat
|
Less flat comparatively
|
12. Applications
|
Used in: blowing engine in steel mills, Low pressure refrigeration, big central air-conditioning plants, fertilizer industry, Superheating IC Engine, Gas pumping in long distance pipe line etc [Previously used in jet engines]
|
Mostly used in jet engines, Power plant, gas turbines and steel mills.
|
Comparison of Reciprocating Compressor and Centrifugal compressor:
Aspects
|
Reciprocating Compressor
|
Centrifugal Compressor
|
1.vibration problems
|
Greater
|
Less
|
2.Mechanical efficiency
|
Lower
|
Higher
|
3. Installation Cost
|
Higher
|
Lower
|
4. Pressure ratio per stage
|
About 5:8
|
About 3:4.5
|
5. Capability to deliver pressure
|
High pressure
|
Medium pressure
|
6. Capability of delivering volume of air/gas
|
Small
|
Greater
|
7. Flexibility in capacity and pressure range
|
Greater
|
No flexibility in capacity and pressure range
|
8. Maintenance expenses
|
Higher
|
Lower
|
9. Continuity of service
|
Lesser
|
Greater
|
10. Compression efficiency
|
Higher at compression ratio above 2
|
Higher at compression ratio less than 2
|
11. Adaptability
|
Adaptability to low speed drive
|
Adaptability to high-speed low maintenance cost drivers such as turbines.
|
12. Operating attention
|
More
|
Less
|
13. Mixing of working fluid with lubricating oil
|
Always a chance
|
No chance
|
14. Suitability
|
For low, medium and high pressure & Low and medium gas volumes.
|
For low and medium pressures & Large gas volumes.
|
Your Like and Share motivate us to post more such posts. So, Please Like & Share it.
0 Comments